Start with evidence
Review representative service, category and content URLs alongside available Search Console information and the website’s current structure.
Get a focused review of your website’s search and enquiry journey, with priorities you can use to plan the next engagement.
The Valley Connect · Report excerpt
Explore the selected reportsPrices cover the listed scope. Additional work and external costs are quoted separately.
Findings become useful when they identify affected pages, business impact and a practical way to check the repair.
Review representative service, category and content URLs alongside available Search Console information and the website’s current structure.
Search Console’s URL Inspection tool can show information about an indexed URL or test its current state. Those views answer different questions.
Group findings by urgency, impact and dependency. Give the implementation team a specific action and an acceptance check for each priority.
Audit scope, implementation and follow-up validation are defined separately so responsibilities remain clear.
Platform reference: Google Search Console: URL Inspection
Review up to 250 URLs and turn the findings into ten evidence-backed priorities your team can act on.
Confirm the website, priority services, access and the concerns the review should answer.
Agree the URL sample and identify unavailable data before analysis.
Review technical, content and local signals in the context of the enquiry journey.
Validate findings against affected pages rather than forwarding unreviewed tool warnings.
Describe the issue, business relevance, recommended fix and acceptance check.
Assign impact, effort and dependencies so the team can decide what to do first.
Walk through the audit and resolve one round of clarification.
Record which findings need development, content or access work; implementation is scoped separately.
Audit with affected URLs, impact/effort roadmap, a sixty-minute review and one clarification round.
Outside this scope: Implementation, exhaustive large-catalogue review, private competitor data and ranking guarantees
7–10 business days after access
One-off; implementation quoted separately
More URLs/templates, multiple properties and rendering complexity raise scope
If the full scope is beyond your budget, we’ll prioritise the most useful work and agree a smaller first phase with you.
Share what is available. We’ll identify any missing access or inputs during scoping.
Published prices apply to the listed scope. Deliverables, timing, revisions and external costs are confirmed before work starts.
An illustrative delivery approach to help you review the scope. This is a planning example, not a client case study.
| Stage | Example work | Acceptance or decision |
|---|---|---|
| Finding | An important service page is absent from the main service navigation. | Verify that the page is useful, current and intended for discovery. |
| Recommendation | Add a descriptive link from the relevant service hub and related pages. | Assign a content owner; review link wording in context. |
| Acceptance | The link resolves to the intended page and can be followed without JavaScript. | Record the change; monitor discovery separately from enquiries. |
Explore the screenshots and open each project’s case study for context. Select an image to inspect it in the viewer.
Organic search activity
Search performance as captured in the supplied report; filters and figures are unchanged.
Titles, descriptions and canonical URL
A page-level metadata check showing the title, description, indexability and canonical URL.
Mobile page experience
A mobile test snapshot with the original performance and page-quality scores.
Structured data validation
The test result and detected structured-data items shown in the supplied report.
Sitemap processing status
The submitted sitemap’s processing result and discovered-page count.
A service page in search
The captured search result for a plumbing service query; rankings vary by location and time.
Each image is a separate report excerpt. Reporting windows and filters may differ; screenshots alone do not establish sales, growth or an ongoing ranking.
Read the business context, documented work and results shown in each screenshot.
Browse project case studiesProfile setup, posts and review workflows.
Ongoing service-page and search work.
A bounded development sprint.
You receive an audit of up to 250 URLs, ten prioritised findings with impact and effort, a review call and one clarification round. Each actionable finding should show the affected page, evidence, recommended change and acceptance check. Implementation is excluded from the audit price; use your developer or agree a separate fix sprint.
It identifies a specific issue and the page or template affected, explains the business relevance and gives a testable fix. The example below shows that structure. A tool warning without validation is not a completed recommendation.
Yes: assign each accepted finding an owner, dependency and release stage. Confirm implementation effort after access and code review; the audit estimate is not an unlimited development commitment.
$500 – $1,250 / audit. One-off; implementation quoted separately These are published USD prices. The written quote must state the complete cost, payment schedule and applicable taxes.
7–10 business days after access. To scope the work, prepare: Website; concern; available analytics/access. The schedule starts after the required access, inputs and approvals are ready.
Use the listed deliverables and exclusions as the starting point. The quote must state acceptance checks, review rounds, payment stages, cancellation arrangements and any ongoing support. Requested additions need an agreed cost and schedule before implementation.
Tell us where you are, what needs to change, and what success would look like for your business.